Noah's ark (Rick)
Farrell Till jftill@midwest.net
Sat, 14 Feb 1998 21:58:14 -0800 (00887543894, 2.2.32.19980215055814.006db5b8@midwest.net)
At 01:20 PM 2/14/98 -0800, Aubrey Matthews wrote:
>At 05:09 PM 2/13/98 -0800, you wrote:
>>At 10:48 AM 2/13/98 -0800, Aubrey Matthews wrote:
>>>RICK
>>>> >
>>>> >Am I reading this right? They have sattelite photos from 1952
>>>Washington?
>>>> >The first man-made sattelite(sputnik) wasn't launched until 1957 or '58.
>>>I
>>>> don't
>>>> >believe that a KH-11 was sent up until the late 70's or early eighies.
>>>> >
>>
>>AUBREY
>>>No. You read it wrong in regards to 1952. Somewhere, someone got confused
>>>by trying to connect the events in 1952, with satellite photos. If you
>>>guys get that confused over something like this, then all I can say is
>>>this: "It is no small wonder why this message board exist."
>>>
>>
>>TILL
>>Well, here are Aubrey's own words cut from one of his earlier postings:
>>
>>>If I remember right, the Washington Times did the story, but I want to make
>>>sure of that tomorrow at the library. It could also have been the Post too.
>>>All I know is that it was a newspaper from Washington. The photos of the
>>>object were from Corona, KH-8 and KH-11, spy satellites and U-2 spy planes.
>AUBREY
>
>Sorry, Till, The November 1997, Washington Times article wasn't about the
>1952 UFO incidents over Washington. I should have made it clearer since I
>had mentioned the Washington UFO flap at the same time.
>
TILL
Yes, you do have problems communicating clearly. I guess you noticed that I
wasn't the only one who understood that you were claiming satellites had
photographed the 1952 incidents. As for your demands that I check into the
"evidence" for these encounters, if you have such evidence, why not post it
yourself? Do you think that I have the time to check into every nutty claim
that is made by someone with an X-Files mentality? I can't even keep up
with the postings that have to do with biblical inerrancy, which is the
reason why the Errancy list was set up. If you have any kind of evidence to
present about Noah's ark, let's see it, but don't ask me to spend time
trying to locate the evidence that you claim exists. If you want to discuss
UFO's, go back to your UFO list. That subject is off topic here, unless, of
course, you want to take the same position as another nut who once contacted
me claiming that Ezekiel's visions were really encounters with UFO's. If
that should be your position, we will expect you to support it with evidence
and not just challenges for us to spend time looking for the evidence that
you claim exists. In other words, Aubrey, the one who makes a claim has the
duty to present the evidence that supports that claim.
Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net