Claire to Farrell Till

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

At 09:43 PM 2/12/98 -0500, Brian Dean wrote:


>BRIDEAN

>Actually, I agree with Claire here.  If Till wants to force the list to

focus on 

>Bible errancy then he should complain about people making fun of Mother

>Theresa AS WELL AS people who merely post what the Catholic church

>says.  Actually, Till should complain about this particular post by me as

>well because I do not address Bible errancy/inerrancy anywhere in this

>entire post.  Be consistent Till!

>


TILL
Everyone on the list will at times send postings that don't relate to
biblical inerrancy, and I don't really object to this, but Claire has
carried it to the extreme. Do you recall any attempt that she has made to
defend biblical inerrancy by logical argumentation?  If she has, it must
have been in some of her postings that I didn't read.  All I recall from her
are postings that state what she personally believes, what Christians
believe, what the Bible says, what her religious instructors say, etc.  Look
at what this has done.  About 99% of the postings the past few weeks have
been reactions to this kind of thing, and biblical inerrancy has taken a
back seat.

Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net

• Previous message: Claire to Farrell Till
• Next message: Claire to Farrell Till: Excessive postings apparently unrelated to biblical errancy
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]