(Nancy): fully divine and fully human

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

WALT, JR

>Nancy,

>

>As usual, you do not read posts carefully.  If you read my post again, you

will see that I said that my analogy was not perfect, though it was better
than your cloth one.  The essential intent of my post was to give a better
analogy.  Liquid and solid water would be analogous to the separate forms of
Christ and the Father, yet the essence of  water is H(2)O which would be
analogous to the essence of God.  Certainly this analogy breaks down, but it
is better than the cloth one.

>

>Walt Jr.

>

NANCY
Bullshit, Walt. The cloth analogy is intended to show the stupidity of
claiming that Jesus was fully human and fully divine. Your H(2)O analogy
only proves just how silly the fully human, fully divine claim is since a
given quantity of H(2)O cannot be both fully water and fully ice. Come to
think of it, the H(2)O analogy makes a pretty darned good case against the
fully human, fully divine claim. Maybe I'll start using it myself.

By the way, Dodge Jr, it did not slip our notice that you avoided addressing
all the criticisms I made of your analogy. As usual, you simply reasserted
your original claim. Well, some things never change - death, taxes, and
Dodge, Jr.

Nancy Todd
todds@pa.net

• Previous message: (Nancy): fully divine and fully human
• Next message: (Nancy): fully divine and fully human
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]