Trinity? (was Re: The Supreme Sacrifice)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Joseph Crea wrote:


> Hello, Michael!

>

> At 09:34 AM 2/8/98 -0800, Michael W. Fisher wrote:

>

> FISHER

>

> --snip--

>

> >    In fact, the trinity doctrine is nothing but inchoate nonsense which only a

> >Christian can pretend to accept and is always in the end described as "a

> >mystery"; i.e., it doesn't make any sense, it can't be explained, so just shut

> >up and turn up the credulity on your indoctrination amplifier.

>

>

> CREA

>     Then I take that you are acquainted with David Brown's  philosophical

> defense of the doctrine against the charge of incoherence, __The Divine

> Trinity__ (Open Court, 1985, ISBN 0-87548-439-5)?

>


MWF 2/8    Actually no. I'll put it on my to do list. I should get to it around
2010, I think.

    Ciao.


--
       Michael Fisher, ET1/SS USN ret., law student

 >>NEW->http://www.infidels.org/library/humor/lioaca.html

       http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html

       http://home.aol.com/Mfish6994

        *               *               *

        ". . . a very LONG discussion is one of the most
        effective veils of Fallacy: . . . A Fallacy which
        when stated barely . . . would not deceive a child,
        may deceive half the world if diluted in a quarto
        volume"
               Richard Whately, "Elements of Logic", p. 151

• Previous message: Trinity? (was Re: The Supreme Sacrifice)
• Next message: The Piso Page (was Re: Origins of Christianity)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]