Trinity? (was Re: The Supreme Sacrifice)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Hello, Michael!

At 09:34 AM 2/8/98 -0800, Michael W. Fisher wrote:

FISHER

--snip--


>    Then some clever bishop somewhere came up with the trinity double talk. The

>Jews were not then and are not now fooled, and neither is anyone else, but

>Christians trained from childhood to accept pretzel reasoning (circular

>reasoning with a few extra twists) could swallow the double talk easily and

>believe that they were in fact still mono-theists, and thus could keep their

>mythology (of a Jewish messiah) and theology (we still worship Yahweh!) intact.

>

>    In fact, the trinity doctrine is nothing but inchoate nonsense which only a

>Christian can pretend to accept and is always in the end described as "a

>mystery"; i.e., it doesn't make any sense, it can't be explained, so just shut

>up and turn up the credulity on your indoctrination amplifier.

 

CREA
    Then I take that you are acquainted with David Brown's  philosophical
defense of the doctrine against the charge of incoherence, __The Divine
Trinity__ (Open Court, 1985, ISBN 0-87548-439-5)?


With Mettaa,

Joseph Crea
<Joseph.Crea@worldnet.att.net>

• Previous message: True Xian: Sin not allowed!
• Next message: Trinity? (was Re: The Supreme Sacrifice)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]