Paul had never met Jesus?

Austin Cline Pioneer@infidels.org
Tue, 3 Feb 1998 09:25:16 -0400 (00886533916, v04003a05b0fcc952b7c2@[209.114.145.37])


<snip>

IAN AND PAM DORIAN

>You might also read, "The Mythmaker" Paul and the Invention of
>Christianity by Hyman Maccoby, Harper Press, 1160 Battery St.,
>San Francisco, 94111-1212/
I wouldn't bother, it's not at all well respected in scholarly circles. He makes a *lot* of big "if" statements and then bases all of his conclusions on such large conjectures. He also sets up a polemical contrast between what "scholars" say and what he has "discovered" - as if scholars have been trying to hide something. However, few (if any - possibly some orthodox, conservative scholars do) reputable, academic scholars of christianity are really making the claims he says. He pretends to be letting the reader in on some "big secret," but he isn't. While there may be some support for some of his interpretations, he presents them as being fact when they are not. More damning is his lack of proper method in the presentation of his conclusions. What it comes down to is that the texts are not 100% reliable (big surprise on this list, eh?) and we have to keep in mind the "iffyness" of them. Any conclusions we make about the bible have to be suppositional and provisional. Maccoby simply isn't realistic (or maybe honest) enough to see this. It can be an interesting book - but don't rely on it too much. There are far better books. Austin Cline; German Department; Princeton University --- The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently. - Nietzsche "The Dawn" (1881)