From the Lips of God

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>  BRYCE

>       Ray brings up a good point.  There are several events in the

Bible where

> either nobody was present, or nobody could have lived to tell the

tale.

> <snip> So,  how do inerrantists reconcile the theory of the Gospels

being

> gathered from eyewitnesses with the fact that no eyewitnesses could

have been

> present for these two events?

>  =====================

> Joe Alward:

> 

> This supports what I was saying:  God could have told Mark the

details of the

> visit to the tomb. The only sensible position to take--and Bryce

seems to

> agree--is that the gospels were verbally inspired, as Till desribed

it [snip]

BRYCE
     Well, the only position to take if you're an inerrantist.  I
personally believe that the authors were filling in the holes with
their own imagination.


==
Bryce Anderson
http://members.tripod.com/~Idafab/index.html

Thus spake Nostradamus:  "Two nations shall go to war.  One shall lose."  What a remarkable prediction of the Spanish-American War!

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

• Previous message: From the Lips of God
• Next message: From the Lips of God
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]