'Not yet' or 'not'?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Hello, D.R.!

At 05:02 PM 12/15/98 -0500, D.R. Edwards wrote:

>>EDWARDS

>>True enough - that's always a possibility.  Interestingly enough (to some,

>>maybe), the manuscripts that read "oupo" include some pretty good and old

>>ones.  I'm away from my Greek NT (maybe someone can help me here;

>otherwise,

>>I'll post what the apparatus has tomorrow), but I think some of the oldest

>>papyri and maybe even Aleph and/or B (original or corrected) read "oupo".

>

>

>CREA

>    The apparatus to my copy of NA27 lists Aleph, D, K, 1241 as having

>"ouk", while P66.75, B, L, T, W, theta, upsilon, 070. 0105. 0250f, and

>others as reading "oupo".   Hope that this helps.

>

>EDWARDS

>Thanks - that squares with my general recollection that the manuscript

>evidence, per se, for "oupo" is pretty strong.  I should start carrying my

>Greek NT around with me.  Maybe I will when I get old enough to stop

>worrying about what others might think.


CREA
    And just how old would that be, pray tell?  If you're insinuating that
I'm "old enough to stop worrying about what others might think" -- well... I
quit such nonsense while still in school [ outside of class, of course! ;-)
], and that was quite a while ago!

   About the only thing I worry about these days is getting my name ending
up on some of those  @#$#%!#  direct mail lists (religious and otherwise).


With Mettaa,

Joseph Crea
<Joseph.Crea@worldnet.att.net>

• Previous message: 'Not yet' or 'not'?
• Next message: SPREAD THE WORD
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]