How to argue?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

At 09:44 AM 12/1/98 -0600, you wrote:

>At 08:36 AM 12/1/98 -0700, Vaujin, Michael O (FL51) wrote:

>>Jeff

>>PS In other news, when will CCBE be returning to the blood plague?  Even if

>>it considers the "ken" discussion evaded or quibbled to death, it can still

>>attack the remaining questions such as explaining what source of water the

>>magicians had available and how there was no ecological catastrophe in the

>>nile river and delta region.  Heck, it could still pull out some information

>>on Egyptian history and name the Pharaoh of Egypt at the time of Moses and

>>these plagues.

>>

>>Mike

>>Actually, I think Till and Bell have argued to a standstill on 'ken' issue,

>>and quite frankly I am as tired of the blood plague issue as I was of the

>>Balaam issue when Bell 1st came on the list.  I am more interested in seeing

>>Bell respond to the prophecy issues and the ending of Mark.  Also, has

>>anyone ever asked Bell or the CCBE to take on the problems with Jesus' two

>>genealogies? 

>>

>Ed

>

>While we're on a wish list, I'd like to see 'em try to deal with the two

>deaths of Judas and the disposition of his blood money.

>

>

>

>


Seriously, this Judas thing was the topic of a lunch time discussion with
some of the "rollers" I work with.  Two of the four of them were not even
AWARE of the two versions and spent a few minutes arguing with the other
two.  After a short discussion, one of them came up with the brilliant
deduction that Judas had indeed hanged himself, but after hanging on the
tree for some time fell and burst open.

Damn near wet my pants laughing at that one.  This seemed to be too much
for all of them to buy and they quickly steered the conversation away from
this topic.

Carl

• Previous message: How to argue?
• Next message: How to argue?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]