Talmud and Jesus (M.Bell-H.Willis)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Matthew Bell wrote:

> 

> H.WILLIS

> > This is from the gopher site:

> > (gopher://shamash.org:70/00/judaica/answers/missionaries/mythj.txt) that

> has

> > been mention several times.

> 

> M.BELL

> Yes, I glanced at it the first time you posted it. Forgive me for asking

> what post of mine this is response to (if any), and why you now see fit to

> do what you took umbrage at D.Conklin doing, i.e. posting sources to be

> read rather than posting to the list for open discussion? The article is a

> lengthy one and pretty involved at the same time, requiring much research

> and time to respond to satisfactorily. I will however examine it and post

> relevant parts where I find difficulties or errors, if any exist. I trust

> that I can expect you to respond in kind to my posts.



HELEN:
In most cases even with material avaliable on the web, I do post quotes, but 
since the issues that were raise, "Jesus as myth" and "the Talmud on Jesus" 
run all the way through the essay, even long quotes would not do it justice. 
Since this essay is avaliable on the web, I am not refering as D. Conklin to 
books that might easily take considerable time and money to track down. I 
will try to reply to you as quickly as possible but I do have a life away 
from my computer and the list is very busy now.
Helen
hhiwater@bright.net

• Previous message: FW: What a guy that Hamilton is not
• Next message: Refuting Missionaries (1) (M.Bell-H.Willis)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]