Hypothetical extraterrestrial life
box191@iland.net box191@iland.net
Tue, 26 May 1998 08:57:11 (00896191031, 3.0.5.16.19980526085711.10a7ab38@205.242.230.4)
At 08:04 AM 5/26/98 +0200, jepler-errancy@zero.aec.at wrote:
>DICK JONES
>> No, it most certainly does not. It seems certain that
>> the Earth was the first place in the universe to have
>> life. See Penrose for a detailed explanation from
>> physics and math as to why this must be so.
>Yes, of course. If there were billions and billions of worlds that had
>life, then what are the odds that we'd be on earth.
This is illogical, Fool. In reality we are on earth so
imaginary "odds" do not come into play.
>So, the only tenable
>alternative is that the earth is the only planet with life (probability 1.0
>that we'd be on it in that case) --- Well done Dr. Dick.
No, this is not what Penrose proves, Fool, but then you
never bother to check reality believing any little silly
thing you wish. Penrose's idea is being incorporated into
the theory of Evolution, but then you only like to talk
about Evolution without knowing what it is.
>Jeff aka FALLACY OF RIDICULE
No, Fool Jeff who knows nothing of logic, this is your
FALLACY OF FALSE ANALOGY, as well as your gross ignorance
of the Cosmological Principle of the origin of life in
the universe, something of vital interest to serious
Evolutionists rather than mere anti-Bible-thumpers.
>Jeff Epler (an american student living in France)
What's the problem? Couldn't get into a decent American
school or are Mommy and Daddy janitors at the embassy?
Dick Jones