(Ron) Ron and sex.....
Steve Kolb skolb@treko.net.au
Tue, 26 May 1998 14:20:18 +0800 (00896181618, 01BD88B1.6A9E7380.skolb@treko.net.au)
On 26 May, 1998 12:55 AM, Brian Dean [SMTP:bridean@worldnet.att.net] wrote:
> HELEN:
> Nope, I'm saying that sex as an expression of human love can greatly
> aid humans in enduring the rough stuff. Birth control well practiced, with
> early abortion as a emergency back up if there should be a failure, is a
> possible way of expressing the love without the pregnancy and is a based
> on a far more humane and human understanding of sexuality than the
> perversion of your church.
>
> This church of yours, that spent the last fifty years having a hissy fit over
> heterosexual Catholics enjoying sex without pregnancy, had to be pillage
> in the press and sued in the courts in order to get it to do something
> about the apparently common problem of priests molesting young boys.
>
> I think that if Catholics with any sense would not lecture the rest of the
> word on sexual morality because clearly your church had a morality that
> was very perverse by the standards of the rest of the world until very
> recently.
>
>
> RON
> How can you lecture the Catholic Church when you believe in killing
> your unborn children just so you can express your version of "human
> love"?!
STEVE
Geez Ron, don't ever try to earn a living as a biologist, your family would
starve. Are you still trying to claim that an egg is a chicken?
Methinks that Catholics try to use emotional rhetoric like "unborn children"
even though they know very well that a zygot is not a child. So in that
sense they are "telling lies for God". Stop telling lies Ron.