(Ron) Borgia to Ron
box191@iland.net box191@iland.net
Mon, 27 Apr 1998 20:55:13 (00893732113, 3.0.5.16.19980427205513.0d3fa0b0@mail.iland.net)
At 04:40 PM 4/27/98 -0700, Helen Willis wrote:
>HELEN:
>So are you claiming the Holy Spirit stopped him from using the powers of
>his office for personal gain?
GROSS IGNORANCE OF CHRISTIANITY. The Holy Spirit didn't
stop him from doing a damn thing about personal gain.
You fail to understand the issue. The Holy Spirit prevents
error ONLY in teaching about faith and morals and NEVER
interferes with free will.
>Cersare was truly the pope's hatchet man, by
>the way.
FALLACY OF EMOTIVE LANGUAGE AND FALLACY OF RED
HERRING, proving this person is not a logical thinker.
>I would guess he saw no profit in making
>an ex cathedra ruling is the only reason that didn't.
FALLACY OF NON SEQUITUR, proving this person is
not a logical thinker.
>If priest [sic] can and
>have used the church and the power of their office to rape little
>children, why do you believe that the power to provide moral guidance
>can not be misused by the Catholic Church?
FALLACY OF NON SEQUITUR AND FALLACY OF FALSE
ANALOGY, proving this person is not a logical thinker.
>So let's try my question yet
>again, since we know popes can be corrupt, how do you or any Catholic
>know this pope or any pope isn't as corrupt as Borgia? I not saying he
>is. I'm asking you, Claire and Ron, how you know as Catholics that a
>pope isn't as corrupt as Borgia?
FALLACY OF NON SEQUITUR, proving this person is
not a logical thinker.
>By the way didn't several popes sign off on the Inquisition? Was this
>not an action of moral guidance by the church? Was the Inquisition
>moral? How about the Catholic trials of witches? Didn't the church go
>along with these things? Didn't the church in fact cause these things to
>be?
FALLACY OF NON SEQUITUR, proving this person is
not a logical thinker.
The entire post was a PREJUDICIAL FALLACY and the
FALLACY OF RED HERRING, proving this person is not
a logical thinker.
Dick Jones