(Ron) Christianity not based on the Bible!

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

RICK G
Janet, perhaps Ron is the one who cannot "restrain" his libido. He seems 
to have some kind of an obsession with sex. I'm an atheist and I didn't 
become one because of sex. I became one because after first being a 
Roman Catholic and then being an evangelical bible thumper for 18 years, I 
realized that the basis for affirming the god of christianity, the bible, was so 
full of holes that it would make Swiss cheese envious... hence the name 
"Holey Bible".

If Ron could give us a (one) sound reason (accent the word "Reason") for
believing in a "Supreme Being", then it might go a long way to convincing 
us.

RON
  There's your error! The Church and Christianity preceded the Bible by 
hundreds of years. How could the Bible be the basis of Christianity?

• Previous message: The Bible not 'inerrant'? (Part 1) (amended)
• Next message: (Ron) Catholic divorce
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]