Atheistic morality (or lack thereof)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> Bell

>If a) then that is regrettable, and indeed says little for

>their claim to being a Christian, that they would do so

>without notifying myself the reasons for doing so. The

>individual would be asked to desist from doing so and

>if they did not would be unsubscribed from the list.

>

>If b) then it demonstrates the lack of morality atheists

>have in doing so, aswell as the lack of morality in

>F.Till to receive posts under such conditions.

>

>Mike

>Why is it that when a Christian behaves poorly it only reflects on that

>single individual, but when an atheist behaves poorly it reflects on all

>atheists?  Anyone else notice the double standard above?

>

>April

>Yes, and I pointed that out to Bell in my private post.  He has responded to

>it just as he has responded to the rest - with a resounding note of silence.

>The silence says much, does it not?

>

>John Hamilton

>We've been around this block several times.  Isn't the 'true believers'

>ability to ignore facts really amazing?

>

ACHILLES
I will succomb to the temptation to speculate just a little... it seems
likely from what I have seen that he really regards facts and logic as mere
tools... he will use them when he thinks he can score points with them but
has no loyalty to them at all... rather his yardstick of truth is purely
based on tradition. 

• Previous message: Atheistic morality (or lack thereof)
• Next message: Atheistic morality (or lack thereof)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]