Ron and a standard of

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>>> RON

>>>   Any religion that denies the possibility of a violent God must deny 

>>> the violence of reality, or must deny God's dominion >over Creation. 

>>

>>Tim

>>Random events can be very cruel. There could be a God who created

>>reality, and left it to its own devices. He could still have a

>>"dominion over reality"  but choose not to exercise it.

>*snip*

>

>>Tim

>>Ron, your unsupported, baseless, false, arrogant, mythological, and

>>imbecilic sermonettes are becoming tiresome. If you have no evidence,

>>your ramblings are about as true as Homer's Illyad. Get a clue.

>>

>>

>>

>RON

>  Gosh, I must have touched an exposed nerve! If my semonettes were only 

>tiresome they would cause you to yawn, not get angry. That's the problem 

>with most atheists, they don't really disbelieve in God, they just hate 

>(fear?) Him.

>

>______________________________________________________

>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

>

ACHILLES
That snip was just a bit too heavy handed. Why do you choose to simply snip
the pressing questions he poses and simply respond to his concluding
paragraph, out of context? Do you really think you can misrepresent the
exchange like that before an audience that has a copy of the post you
replied to available? 

Why don't you try answering the questions, or else admitting that you can't
answer them? Simply snipping them out and refusing to deal with them
reflects poorly on you and your god. 

• Previous message: Natural Man
• Next message: Ron and a standard of
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]