(Ron) Definition of Inerrancy (again, the concept of 'oneness')

Brian Dean bridean@worldnet.att.net
Sat, 5 Sep 1998 22:48:44 -0400 (00905068124, 19980906025124.GXWZ1362@109152022worldnet.att.net)



>BRYCE
> Again, you obviously misunderstand the concept of "oneness." If
>you WERE me (which is basically the same as saying you were "one" with
>me) you would not be blowing away everyone who cut you off. You would
>be sitting in front of a computer, trying vainly to think of some way
>to respond to someone who has basically called you an immorral,
>homicidal road maniac. If you were me, you would be wondering why you
>idly lurk on this list instead of working on a fiction novel you
>haven't bothered to look at this last week. You would be wondering if
>the hamburger upstairs is thawed and ready to fry up. In short, if
>you were me, you would be doing exactly what I am doing.
>
> Care to rephrase that?
>
>Bryce "at one with myself" Anderson
RON What?! Are you suggesting that you are able to control your overpowering instincts? Next you'll be telling me that you have a free-will! And how could you possibly be "immoral" since there is no subjective basis for morality, and you and your actions are just the product of hormones and chemicals coursing through your system? How could you possibly be offended since I obviously cannot control what I am typing? Perhaps you could throw some of these concepts into your novel and title it "A Clockwork Orange"? Or has that already been done? ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com