"One cannot prove that which is miraculous" - Matt Bell

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

(from post dated 9/22/97 - Re: No Problems for Matt)


> MATT

> I do apologise for indulging in the moment Farrell. It was splitting hairs

> to make the comment on Matthew/author of Matthew and indeed my post implied

> the conclusion you arrived at. Could not resist the temptation :-) One

> cannot prove that which is miraculous.


KOLLER
"One cannot prove that which is miraculous"?  Why the hell is the thread
concerning the evidence for the virgin birth still going on?  I'm not
disagreeing with your statement Matt, but I think you have just put your
foot in your mouth.

Now I know you are going to reply saying that you didn't really mean it
like it sounded, and other such excuses.  The fact is, the internal
inconsistency (albeit probably subconscious) has led to this
foot-in-mouth problem.

-- 
=====================================================================
 Michael Koller, B.S. Computer Engineering, Penn State University
 e-mail: koller@freethinker.org
 homepage: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Parthenon/2667/index.html
.....................................................................
 Support the Blue Ribbon Campaign for free speech online  ()
 http://www.eff.org/blueribbon.html                       /\
=====================================================================

• Previous message: Backed up in a corner? Not Exactly.
• Next message: What is Windows 95? [Humor]
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]