A Fallacious Tear-Jerking Scenario

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Matt Bell <mbkbell@aapi.co.uk> writes


>I should rephrase 'learn what Christian believe' to 'what the Biblical

>teaching is'  (force of habit equating the two), thanku for the correction

>:) The key element missing from Till's point is that Christ was fully human

>and fully divine, but more importantly that there was spiritual aswell as

>physical suffering involved in the events of the cross. What an omni-max

>could/can do and what he 

>did/does do are two different things.


CARR
Philippians 2:7 says that Christ emptied himself. So he was fully divine
and empty of divinity.

It also says that he was born in the likeness of men. Can you be fully
human and just in the likeness of men?
Similarly Romans 8:3 says that Jesus was just in the 'likeness' of
sinful flesh.

-- 
Steven Carr steven@bowness.demon.co.uk
Visit the UK's leading atheist Web page
 http://www.bowness.demon.co.uk/

• Previous message: A Fallacious Tear-Jerking Scenario
• Next message: A Fallacious Tear-Jerking Scenario
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]