A Fallacious Tear-Jerking Scenario

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

>><snip>

>>NANCY

>>Yes, Matt. What one *can* do and what one *does* do are two different

>>things. That is why I find the xtian god so damned abhorent. He could

>>prevent innocent children from suffering, but he choses not to. He could

>>have made himself known to everyone, and thus have saved countless

>millions

>>from the neverending torment *he* choses to impose upon those he is

>>supposed

>>to love, yet he prefers to torture his creation. He made his own son

>suffer

>>for the sins of others even though he is perfectly capable of forgiving

>>sins

>>without human sacrifice. The only reasonable conclusion to draw is that

>the

>>xtian god is a sadistic bastard who gets his jollies from human suffering.

>>If a human stands idly by while others suffer or causes others to suffer,

>>as

>>the xtian god does, we call him a heartless, inhuman monster. Perhaps we

>>should just call him God.

>>

>>MATT

>>What would you do if your son/daughter was being raped by a group of men.

>>Intervene or stand back and watch?

>>

>>Thanks

>>

>>Matt

>>

>>

>NANCY

>What is the relevancy of this question? 

>

>MATT

>The relevancy is to answer your above post.

>

>Thanks

>

>Matt

>

>

NANCY
How does your question answer my post? 

Nancy Todd
todds@pa.net

• Previous message: A Fallacious Tear-Jerking Scenario
• Next message: Goodbye Yoel :(
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]