"Victory" in Debates

Douglas R. Larson berean@brookings.net
Fri, 17 Oct 1997 23:55:03 -0500 (00877172103, 199710180452.XAA01649@serv.brookings.net)



> My point, Walt, is that victory in debates depends on the predispositions
of
> those who declare victory. I simply let the records of my debates speak
for
> themselves.
Opps! I guess I should have thrown this idea in as well. I was on my noon- hour when I replied, thus being in a hurry. You are, without a doubt, absolutely correct! I tried to insinuate that point with the "preaching to the choir," as I meant that to cover all areas within the "cheer leading section."
> You addressed this posting to Douglas Larson, who mentioned Herman Otten
in
> a posting earlier today. In November 1991, I began a written debate in
> Otten's paper *Christian News,* and my opponent was William Bischoff, a
> Lutheran preacher in Bridgeton, Missouri. Bischoff quit after three
> exchanges, and Otten got a fellow by the name of Charles Provan to
continue
> the debate. After a few exchanges between Provan and me, Otten stopped
the
> debate and refused to publish a manuscript that I sent in response to
> Provan's latest. Yet who do you suppose won this debate? My opponents
did.
> Just ask Otten and the readers of his papers, who are mainly
fundamentalist
> Lutherans. They'll tell you that I lost.
Eh Gad!!! You're on Herman's "Shit List?" I submitted articles on "Lutheran Unionism" and a more biblical examination of the sacraments (opposed to the Formula of Concord) and this guy simply came unglued over the phone. Because of the content of my articles, he too refused to publish them. Thus I too became an entry into his shit list when I described his newspaper ( the Christian News) as a platform of whining because the LC-MS refused to ordain him (Herman). Confessional Lutheranism has done Herman wonders. He follows the tradition well. He has no problems sharing and writing about his views that propagate "Holocaust Revisionism." Speaks for itself, doesn't it? <GRIN>
> While you are at your conference, ask some of these men that you
obviously
> venerate if they will agree to affirm this proposition in public debate:
> "Resolved: the Hebrew god Yahweh exists." Let me know what answer you
get. Only if they maintain tape rights and have enough of the choir on hand. Jesus needs the bucks! Amazing how God can't manage to cover their needs since all they have to do is simply ask--especially if they are doing God's will. Thanks for this post Farrell, Doug Larson