Hi, how's it going?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

	Hi.  Thanks for writing back.  I remember who you are, so ready to
strike with your venomous fingers.  I read over the quote that you cut and
pasted and your quotee made two major assumptions. 



The two "MAJOR" assumptions:


1.  Men(supposive smart men) of the past during the period supposively
when a religion is in its infancy(Christianity has been around since the
beginning of the World and it was started by God) where to wrapped up in
their astrology(because quantum physics wasn't around back in 500 B.C.) to
look into this new religion that started, because it was so obviously
fake.  Yet now, hundreds or thousands of years later we have to turn to
the writers of this religion to see if it lives up to its claims.


2.  But(of course) the words of the writer(a dumbman I might add) 
contradict the laws of physics and even contradict themselves, so that it
is plainly obvious that the writer is incorrect.



Thus, we ALL know that these religions are wrong.






Hey, Ciao.....All I see is a bunch of big words and assumptions.  Were is
the proof..  



Let us probe one of these assumptions shall we....



If it was plainly obvious that the writers of this religion are incorrect,
why are there still scholars that profess to be Christian? 


Is this man, who you quoted, calling all men who are smart and Christian
stupid, and "just one of mislead in the mass"?





You mind has been seered, but I know that when you stand before God on
Judgement Day you will not be saying, "I could swear there was no God".
It will be more like you knew it, but didn't want to believe.



Oh Well, 

I gotta go..



Tony Woodcock.

• Previous message: Hi, how's it going?
• Next message: Hi, how's it going?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]