Assisted suicide, overpopulation, etc. - Let's debate on CyberBlasphemy

Michael W. Fisher mwfisher@cts.com
Sat, 08 Nov 1997 22:46:38 -0800 (00879079598, 34655C4D.CCAEC8BA@cts.com)



Claire E. O'Connor wrote:


>
<snip>
> I am going to respond to people's assertions as best I can. However, I
> think that this Bible errancy board is not really the place for this
> debate about assisted suicide, abortion, etc. I invite you to come over
> to CyberBlasphemy and debate with me there. You will feel very
> comfortable on that board, even if I won't.
>
> The link to CyberBlasphemy is as follows:
>
> http://www.cyberfunk.com/blasphemy/cb/
>
Just go to the Objective Dicussion of religion list, listed at the Internet Infidels website,: OBJ-REL (Objective Discussion of Religion) Subscription Requests: send email to <listserv@emuvm1.cc.emory.edu>. In the message body, type "subscribe obj-rel Firstname Lastname". Moderated: No Closed: No Owner: Bert Bruner <OSAKB@emuvm1.cc.emory.edu> Description: Discussion is intended to be centred around such topics as: existence of God or gods, creationism versus evolution, reasons for the existence of religions, epistemology, religion and government, religious behavioral norms, effects of religion on society, and any discussion related to religion that offers to broaden our scope of understanding. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ It's kind of slow at the moment, and not, as near as I can tell, particularly hostile at all. And the issue of suicide certainly seems to fit well within "religious behavioral norms" and the "effects of religion on society". And I'm already there. :-) Ciao. -- Michael Fisher, ET1/SS USN ret., lawstudent http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html http://home.aol.com/Mfish6994 * * * He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself. Thomas Paine