The Powders Wet in Dave's Canon (to Darrel)

David Court (hoover1@NETCOM.CA)
Fri, 23 May 1997 19:40:27 -0400 (EDT)

DAVE
Ralph: As I have stated before, I am very poorly informed on
>the process of canonization,...
>I acknowledge that there is dispute as to what should and
should not be
>"included" in the Bible...

RALPH
Just as I prophesied: a cop-out. Dave, you admit you are "very
poorly informed" as to the contents of the official "inerrant"
Bible. >>

(DAVE 5/22) Ralph: Did I admit I didn't know the "contents"
of the Bible? Hmmmm, please show me where. >>

DAR
How soon Dave forgets. When it is convenient:
Dave< "I am very poorly informed on the process of
canonization,..."
"I acknowledge that there is dispute as to what should and
should not be "included" in the Bible..."

DAVE
I "admitted" not having a good grasp on the process of
canonization.

DAR
Typical Dave quibble. The "process of canonization" is the act
of determining the "contents" of the Bible.

(DAVE 5/23) Darrel: Typical Darrel context-warping. The "act" and the
"content" are two different things. I said I was weak on the "act" but not
necessarily on the "content". seems a fairly important "quibble".

Regards.

Dave.

"Enough awareness invaded your consciousness that you realized it was best
to get out of bed, into your clothes and get on with the day...In the same
way, enough of the Person of Christ and his purposes and the needs of the
world must invade our consciousness so that we are able to sleep no
longer...we awake to get on with God's redemptive purposes."
- Bryant