> Yoel
> There is not enough information given in the
> Bible to know for certain that they are not the same place.
>
> (DAVE 5/6) Yoel: So why are you supporting Izzy and Farrell who say they
> weren't? How can I defend the fact that they weren't when we don't even
> know this is the case? You have proven my point anyway (it's good that
> someone' points are being supported here).
>
> Yoel
> But what
> information IS given would lead one to logically surmise that they are not,
> especially when one considers the Christian claim that this book is unlike
> any onther the "inspired" word of an omniscient deity. THERE IS NO
> INFORMATION GIVEN IN THE BIBLE which would indicate that Moseroth and Mt.
> Hor are the same place.
>
> (DAVE 5/6) Yoel: Agreed, except for one problem - the Bible does state
> that Aaron died in Moserath and on Mount Hor - I would say that the Bible is
> maiing the claim that they were the same place, wouldn't you? After all,
> Aaron can only die once.
Mike 5/11 Dave: With a deity who allegedly intervenes to resurrect the
dead, why would you assume Aaron can only die once? What supposedly
happened with many of the "saints" who supposedly were resurrected
according to "Matthew?" I would say the Bible is making the claim
Moseroth and Mount Hor are the same place if I assumed the Bible's
without error, and all of its problems must have a reconciliation.
Without that assumption, I would not assume both names are referring to the
same mountain, especially if there's no evidence within the Bible in support.
Since there are thousands of alleged Biblical contradictions, and many of
their "reconciliations" are so elaborate and seemingly contrived based on
the assumption of Biblical inerrancy (and if used as valid means for
dispelling a contradiction, no contradiction could ever be shown), I see
no reason not to see the mention of two places for Aaron's death just
another contradiction.
Mike