THIS IS STUNNING CREATIONIST EVIDENCE because it agrees with what we
again read in The Holy Scriptures...
>
> This particular case obviously cannot be dismissed as an example of
> reworking of two originally distinct fossil deposits,. Neither can they
> be attributed to modern carvings, as many of the tracks both of man and
> dinosaur, were freshly exposed by excavation of overlying strata within
> the past few years by a large team of workers and observers.
> Why these fossils are here preserved here as they are is because of the
the uniqueness of the limestone to record initially and retain fossil
imprints permanently over the course of time
TILL
Magill, are you so uninformed on this subject that you don't even know that
leading creationists like Henry Morris have admitted that these tracks were
a hoax? They have even reissued some of their books to remove references to
the Paluxy River tracks. Despite this, uninformed "apologists" like you and
Kent Hovind continue to cite this as proof of creationism.
Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net