I can write better than this if I feel inclined to do so.
I do not like your put downs, but If I be reproached for the name of
Christ happy am I, for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon me; on
their part He is evil spoken of, on my part He is glorified.(paraphrase:
1 Peter 4:14).
On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, Michael Fisher wrote:
> A real live person who claims to be a college student wrote the
> following:
>
> I have read some of those Scientific American. What most of that is a
> bunch of fascinations. They do not really present facts, but they do
> present a lot of major innuendo biases. Neither of those two animals are
> proof, I am pretty sure.
>
> MWF
> Wow.
>
> What can I say? Is that English? It looks like a collection of
> mostly English words but:
>
> What are "fascinations"?
>
> What's an "innuendo bias"?
>
> Sci Am may not be "Nature" or the JAAAS, but it has certainly
> done a pretty fair job of presenting facts in its articles for so long
> as I've been reading it, which I must admit is over twenty years now. It
> just doesn't dive quite so deep into the math as a "genuine" scientific
> paper does.
>
> Tony, one last time:
>
> Try to prove me wrong.
>
I will. There are so many innuendos between the lines....You will
see.
> MWF
> Heck, if I cut your heart out and your head off, pureed your
> heart and then boiled your head in the puree, and served it all
> back---you'd never even notice.
>
> How can I prove anything to someone so thorougly illiterate,
> ignorant and incapable of rational thought??
>
> In wonderment (which word IS in the dictionary);
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Fisher, ET1/SS USN ret., law student
>
> http://home.aol.com/Mfish6994
>
> * * *
>
> He that would make his own liberty secure,
> must guard even his enemy from oppression;
> for if he violates this duty,
> he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.
>
> Thomas Paine
>
A servant in Christ,
Tony Woodcock.