He'll make a perfect lawyer in California.
MWF
Alas Dave, Sarah and I met while I was doing some housekeeping on my
AOL account and chatted for awhile, and also exchanged correspondence.
I'm afraid I've convinced her I'm right. And she is now studying the
sites I recommended.
And what "double standard" Dave? I simply insist that an argument be
present AND that it not fall into any logical fallacies. Just where have
__*I*__ failed to meet my own standard?
Even where I'm indulging in a little ad hominem abuse where it seems
deserved, I always try to throw in an actual argument or two or a dozen along
the way, along with supporting facts as necessary.
You, as usual, have done nothing of the kind indulging yourself in
nought BUT an ad hominem abusive.
I certainly have never told anyone to "keep [their] trap shut". But if
you open it, and cannot make a logical argument, well, you deserve whatever you
get back.
And if I'm shallow Dave, then you're a molecular film.
Ciao.
-- Michael Fisher, ET1/SS USN ret., law student* * * He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself. Thomas Paine