Re: ABSOLUTE knowledge

Michael Fisher (mwfisher@CTS.COM)
Mon, 06 Jan 1997 00:38:21 -0800

Kevin Ramessar u wrote:

> Do you maintain the same skepticism and objectivity about your
> own predispositions and beliefs as you require of me?

Probably more so.

Part of accepting a basically scientific paradigm of knowledge
is to be ready to change ones beliefs when the evidence rolls in, even
if you have to give up a pet theory.

It's called an open belief system.

It's just that those of us with open belief systems have
developed highly refined bull shit filters.

Right now I believe that the person of Moses is entirely a
figure of legend--but if you can dig up some evidence beyond Bible
legends, that there really was such a person, I'll change my belief on
that point.

About the time I was getting old enough to even concern myself
with such things, one of the first beliefs that had to change was the
historicity of Troy. Turns out to have been a real city.

As a jr. high and high school student, the modern synthesis in
evolution had not fully penetrated to secondary school levels, and I
found myself having to update what I thought true of evolution and
biology.

It requires work, but hey, its worth it not to have ones head
filled with ancient superstitions or modern prejudices.

Ciao..

-- 
	Michael Fisher, ET1/SS USN ret., law student	

http://home.aol.com/Mfish6994

* * * He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself. Thomas Paine

==================================================================== For help, send a message to errancy-request@infidels.org with the word "help" in the subject or body of your message. To unsubscribe from ERRANCY, send a message to errancy-request@infidels.org with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject or body of your message.