RJV 1/13
Ronal, If the flood only occured in the northern and southern portions of
the earth - then Noah had to be in that location - as did Mount Arafat (or
whatever it is called). Does the geological location that the mount must
be in correspond to your ideas on how everything fit together?
BAKER 1/13
It is true what you say that Noah had to have been located in an area that
was affected by the flood. Had he been somewhere in northern Africa he might
still have built a boat, but would not have had to use it. Ararat is further
to the north and it too must have been involved with the flood waters, but
to what extent I don't know. Most every skeptic immediately assumes that
Ararat was at the level it is today. That of course is not likely to be true
because the land masses had not separated until much later, which was the
force that pushed the mountains upward when the continental shelves
collided. I don't want to make a mountain out of a mole hill, but that is
exactly what I think I have to do. Ararat may have been 100 feet high, or
700 hundred feet high before the flood occurred, I just don't know what its
height was before and during that flood.
Ronal Baker <bakerr@cdsnet.net> Author of *Biblical Dinosaurs*
--------------------------------------------------------------
The world's first Rapid Evolutionist. Rapid evolution is true
and the Bible proves it!
====================================================================
For help, send a message to errancy-request@infidels.org with the word
"help" in the subject or body of your message. To unsubscribe from
ERRANCY, send a message to errancy-request@infidels.org with the word
"unsubscribe" in the subject or body of your message.