re: what exploded the BB (Farrell)
Aubrey Matthews (paubrey@CASTLES.COM)
Thu, 6 Feb 1997 14:26:28 -0800
> TILL
>> Didn't you read my posting in response to Walt's ventures into this
>> same area? You want to presuppose the existence of an eternal,
>> omniscient, omnipotent, self-existing deity, so why can't I presuppose
>> that matter is eternal and self-existing? My position would be far
>> more logical than yours, because the particles that make up matter are
>> very simple in their structure, so I am merely presupposing the
>> self-existence of that which is simple, but you are presupposing the
>> self-existence of a deity who is so complex that he has unlimited
>> knowledge and power that enables him to create matter out of nothing
>> and then organize it into all the things that you claim show design
>> and purpose. If you consider the self-existence of the simplest
>> particles of matter to be impossible, then it is infinitely more
>> illogical of you to consider that the self-existence of your very
>> complex deity is not only possible but highly probable. If not, why
>> not?
If the universe was eternal, how long can I wait for the next "Big Bang"?
The laws of Entrophy prevents that. Creation happened once and once only.
Where did it all come from and how and why? After everything was blown
apart, particles had to start forming to create life. The odds that chance
did is nil. Many calculations have been done as I said before and Einstein
never believed that chance had nothing to do with it despite his beliefs.
Aubrey
====================================================================
For help, send a message to errancy-request@infidels.org with the word
"help" in the subject or body of your message. To unsubscribe from
ERRANCY, send a message to errancy-request@infidels.org with the word
"unsubscribe" in the subject or body of your message.