Evening church

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

In a message dated 22/8/97  15:57:38, you write:


>> For instance, "it's remarkable" how well Windows NT 4.0 works compared

>> to Windows 2.0, but I don't think you'll tell me it's perfect, or a

>> creation of an infinite god.  Will you? 

> WHAT?!!  Bill Gates is not God?  (Do you think anybody has the nerve to

> tell him that?) <G>

  
Hmmm... never heard the words 'works' and 'well' applied to an MS O/S
before (except maybe DOS3.3 ?)

Actually God and BillG have many common features - a complete lack of
coherency, capricious behaviour, only telling you the rules after you've 
made the mistakes, desire to control everyone etc. Is Windows 95 God's
punishment for us ? Could Memphis be the much prophesised Armegeddon ?
- will Jesus return 7 years after a Bug-free Windows appears (whew ! no
probs)
Did Satan write Linux and OS/2 to turn us from the true path of right[This
application has terminated with an error at 0442:CA36]ouesness. (For
proof see GetDeviceCaps II.4)

However, the Bible is a far more coherent and consistent document than 
the Windows Technical References, however there are a bunch of idiots in
Redmond who believe the APIRef to be inerrant and internally consistent.

I don't think theres an intelligent designer behind Windows either.
(and if you don't believe me look at the API design !)

Paul Robson (autismuk@aol.com)
[Occasional Windows Developer]

• Previous message: Evening church
• Next message: Other NT References to Isaiah 53
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]