Errancy list

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

At 01:18 PM 8/8/97 -0500, Till wrote:


>At 08:58 AM 8/8/97 -0400, DrJDPrice@aol.com wrote:



>>Dear Farrell:

>>Please inform your errancy list that my discussions are limited 

>>to interaction with you. I am too busy to interact with everyone 

>>who might choose to respond to me. Please ask your list to 

>>refrain from cluttering my e-mail box with uninvited posts.

>

>TILL

>I will post this to the errancy list, but I will not ask the members of the

>list not to respond to you.  Inerrantist members of the list, who cannot

>defend their positions, are seeking your help and then posting your comments

>to the list.  I think the list members are entitled to respond to you if

>they wish.  If you don't want this, then you should tell KATZ and the others

>that you will not assist them anymore.  That would be the easiest way for

>you to end the matter.


ADNAN
If Price discussion are only restricted to Till then why did he reply to
Yoel postings? If he has no hesitation in replying to Yoel then why would
he claim that he only wants to debate Till? Second, I never forwarded Katz
or MCD, the posting of Yoel to which he was replying, (i.e isiah 53), how
did he got hold of Yoel posting in the first place? May be Katz or some of
Katz friends are subscribed to errancy and are forwarding errancy postings
to Price, so that they can get Price responses and post them on their web
(as Katz is doing.
Is this correct Price? Why don't you ask them to also post on their web the
different responses which are posted to you on his list? (to be fair).

• Previous message: Errancy list
• Next message: Errancy list
• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]