Re: POSSIBLE ERRANCY FAQ

Farrell Till (jftill@midwest.net)
Wed, 23 Apr 1997 00:04:38 -0500 (CDT)

RICK
I agree 100% with Hobbs. they can't argue inerrancy without looking like
fools, so I would keep the format just as it is for now, but I would add
an FAQ just to set some informal ground rules.

TILL
I was wondering about a statement on a FAQ sheet that would inform
inerrantists that a skeptic or atheist will respond to their postings about
the existence of god, evolution, origin of the universe, and such like only
on the condition that they agree to respond to a posting on an inerrancy
issue. If they don't keep the agreement, then refuse to respond to any more
of their postings.

Farrell Till
Skepticism, Inc.
jftill@midwest.net