with the existence of hell. And with the issue of sin. And with our=20
"purpose" on earth, and our eventual "destiny". And much more. ALL of =
this=20
is addressed in this supposedly errant book, yet you and others wish to=20
avoid discussion on them. Why is this? Is there something about these=20
issues that troubles you in such a way that you DON'T believe that the =
Bible=20
is necessarily errant about them?
I disagree with Morgan a little here - saying that the atheist may not =
want=20
to defend such a weak position when it comes to these isssues - they =
really=20
don't have a position to defend at all it seems.
So these calls to "get back to errancy discussions" are really the =
ultimate=20
dodge - the real issues all of a sudden "don't apply" to biblical =
inerrancy=20
- - I wonder why.
[John Hamilton]
If memory serves, the errantists kicked the inerrantists buts =
(metaphorically speaking) on everyone of those topics *before* asking =
them to return to the errancy topic.