[Fwd: [Fwd: Ronald Nash]]
Jeff Magill (jmagill@mail.gte.net)
Sat, 19 Apr 1997 10:31:00 -0800
>
> Farrell Till wrote:
> >
> > WALT JR
> >
> > Darrel,
> >
> > These quotes of yours were nothing but assertions. There was no evidence to
> > support any of those claims. The basic argument is that because there is
> > superficial similarity somewhere else, then there must have been borrowing
> > taking place. That type of reasoning is not persuasive enough. In fact, if
> > anything, it was pagan religion that borrowed from the Judeao/Christian
> > tradition. Have you read Ronald Nash's work, "The Gospel and the Greeks" ?
> >
> > TILL
> > I'm sorry, Walt, but Ronald Nash is very definitely a biased source,
>
> Magill- According to Mr. Till whose father is the father of lies...
>
> One of the definitions of Bias is- an opinion made without an adequate
> basis. Ask Till what evidence is not substaniated for his claims to be
> construed as biased. Just because one holds to a view prior to examing a
> claim does not make one biased. One should seek truth and reject error
> with a heart bent on finding the truth with everything that is within
> one's own being.
>
> so we
> > have to toss him out. If you can't allow Campbell because he was biased,
> > then we certainly can't allow Nash. If you want to talk about bias, Nash
> > will give us a lot to talk about.
>
> Magill- Walt, you might as well never discuss anything again with the man of human wisdom,
> according to his own warped reasoning. Every source Mr. Till uses is
> biased against The Truth. Satan throughout the ages has always
> conterfeited the Scriptures with his own brand of psuedo religious
> garble. All cultures and civilizations in the world that don't hold to
> the Truth of God's Word have their own polluted and warped version of
> Biblical Truth. The creation of the universe, the story of the flood
> etc., but none of them hold water when it comes to the scientific
> evidence we have. Only the Bible agrees with all the known scientific
> laws and evidences we see in nature. In the fossil record for example,
> we see life in myriads of forms suddenly appearing on the scene at the
> same time. We don't see any transitional forms anywhere on the planet.
> In the fossil record we also see evidence that at one time the entire
> earth was covered by water which is exactly what the creation model
> predicts. Till's sources have always been biased since the day I first
> came across his listings. Don't let his fallacy babble fool you. Even if
> he looks great in his own eyes and to others who don't hold fast to the
> Truth of The Bible, it still doesn't change a thing. God has spoken how
> he did this whole thing we call life and no human being we ever negate
> His revelation of Himself to mankind through His Holy Word. Scoffers are
> just that - Scoffers...
>
> "For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness
> and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
>
> Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath
> shown it unto them.
>
> For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are
> clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His
> eternal power and Godhead; SO THAT THEY ARE WITHOUT EXCUSE!!!!!!
>
> IN HIS GRIP,
>
> JM
>
> >
> > Farrell Till
> > Skepticism, Inc.
> > jftill@midwest.net