Now listen to what you just said dad. You have ruled out even the =
possibility of any evidence for "intelligent design." No matter what =
happens to evolutionary theories as we know them today, YOU KNOW that =
the new theories will not require God. How do you know this dad? Your =
dogmatism on origins seems to be rather irrational. =20
Walt Jr.
----------
From: Walter Nusbaum[SMTP:nusbaum@iglobal.net]
Sent: 17 April 1997 16:38
To: Walter Nusbaum
Cc: errancy@infidels.org
Subject: RE: Explaining lifes complexity
If evolution is false, it will be because another theory has replaced it
that more adequately explains the known facts of life on earth. What =
then?
That self-correcting body of knowledge, generally known as science, will
continue its relentless progress.
Best wishes,
Walt Sr.
=20
At 02:42 AM 4/17/97 -0500, you wrote:
>What if evolution (macro) is false? Then what?
>
>----------
>From: John L. Hamilton[SMTP:jlhamltn@pacbell.net]
>Sent: 15 April 1997 11:34
>To: 'errancy'
>Subject: Explaining lifes complexity
>
>
>"The complexity of life requires an explanation."
> - Dan Barker
>
>"The explanation is evolution"
> -John Hamilton
>
>
>