(Ian 4/15) Perhaps I do not understand. I assume you are talking about the
Judeo-Christian God. Who would argue errancy on the false premise that god
exists?
> (Dave 4/15) Yes, it can be discussed. However, the "ultimate" error of the Bible would be that God does not exist, a fact no one can show.
(Ian 4/15) That's true. No one can prove that god does exist and no one can
prove that god does not exist.
(Dave 4/15) So to argue it as knowing he doesn't exist, would be a false
premise. That is all.
(Ian 4/15) I don't necessarilly agree with you.
> Ian
> Tell me you didn't say that. Well, if you did, I don't know what
> the hell you're doing on this list. And when are you going to answer my
> posts? The ones you snipped from my original.
>
> (DAVe 4/15) Ian: You know what I'm doing on this list - I posted that to
> you. As far as your posts, I have about 60 still in my mail to answer - I
> will respond.
(Ian 4/15) O.K. Dave. At least I see why it's so hard to understand what you
write. I'd hate to get myself in that kind of a jamb.
>
> regards.
>
> dave.
>
> "True faith cannot exist when doubt isn't around to ask the hard questions."
> - Kenneth Gibble