Re: The elements (to Dave)

Aaron Oakley (s_aarono@eduserv.its.unimelb.EDU.AU)
Tue, 15 Apr 1997 11:39:34 +1000 (EST)

[stuff deleted]
> Izz
> Aubrey does not see that no gap in science leads to God;
> neither is God necessary at all in science. Science is atheistic - without
> God.

> (DAVE 4/14) Izz: I disagree. Science, as a discipline, is an act of
> discovery. Discovery of what? What is made by God. Under what authority?
> Under Gods authority. Who uses science? Those who God created.
> So I believe science to be intermingled with God actually. They are not
> "separate" or "opposing" things.

Aaron O.-
You are making baseless assertions again, Dave. Yes, science is
a tool for discovery and understanding. But you assert that
science discovers what is "made by God". I am not impressed.
the BURDEN OF PROOF lies with you. You must prove what you
are saying. You haven't. God created us? Rubbish! Evolution
created us. All of your arguments seem to boil down to
assertions about your alleged God and his alleged role in
the universe.