The elements (to Izz)

David Court (hoover1@NETCOM.CA)
Sun, 13 Apr 1997 19:58:25 -0400 (EDT)

> God lit the "fuse of
> creation" and 'chance' had nothing to do with it. Sometimes the answer
that
> you seek is all around you.
>
> Aubrey

Aubrey, is it valid to just assume that whatever science does not explain, is
attributed to God?

(DAVE 4/13) Izz: If something exists, then it must have "explanation".
Since science is in the business of discovery and explanation, it is within
the realm of science to "discover" and, hence, "explain" anything. Science
and God do not have to be separated - something that science cannot explain
right now is only because science has not found the answer - it doesn't mean
it will never find the answer. Attribution to God can exist for things
science can already explain as well as for what it can't explain. Science
can simply be a tool for which mankind discovers what God has already
created. ALL can be attributed to God, and ALL can, in theory, be explained
by science.

I see no reason for these two to oppose each other.

Regards.

Dave.

"The complexity of life requires an explanation."
- Dan Barker