Re: "Good" (to Dave)

Dardedar@AOL.COM
Sun, 13 Apr 1997 17:43:34 -0400 (EDT)

In a message dated 97-04-12 18:26:05 EDT, you write:

<< >(DAVE 4/11) Ian: I can only speak for myself here, but I
have never called
>the Bible the "good" book - I think it's lame actually.

RALPH
I can't believe my eyes. For months now on this line Dave has
been denying that the Bible contains the slighest error or
inconsistency. Now he calls it "lame, actually." Dave, are you
finally beginning to get your eyes open? >>

DAR
No, he is not. Dave just has a very poor grasp of English and
that words have meaning. Any one who wishes to converse
with him should realize that this before they invest a great deal
of time in responses to him.
If they wish to spend their time more productively I might
suggest that try getting some nails and some jello and then
proceed to spend some time trying to nail the jello to a wall.

Now that is a GOOD analogy.

cheers,

Darrel

------------------------
"My eye isn't the only thing with a blind spot." --DAVE
11/30

"I believe in miracles, but not in occurrences that have no
explanation." --DAVE 2/8