Well, I do have a problem with that claim. It all depends on what you mean by "accurate to that originally written." The addition of the Marcan Appendix, the elimination of the story of the woman taken in adultery, the elimination of the confession of the Ethiopian eunuch, etc., suggest that considerable tampering with the text has taken place. To see an example of what I would consider a significant variation, read 1 John 5:7-8 in the KJV, and then read it in the ASV, RSV, NRSV, NIV, and other later translations.
Such variations as these are enough to cast serious doubt on how accurately the "original autographs" were transmitted.
< We would all certainly have a problem with the claim that the events of the Bible, no matter how accurately transmitted, actually were real, historical events.>
Yes, and I fail to see any indication in Geisler's speeches that he understood this.
F. Till