Miller, S.L., 1953 Production of amino acids under possible primitive
Earth ocnditions. Science 117: 5:28
Miller, S.L., 1955. Production of some organic compounds under possible
primitive earth conditions. J Am. Chem. Soc 77: 2351
Miller,S.L. and H.C. Urey, 1959. Organic compound synthesis on the
primitive earth. Science 130: 245.
Ponnamperuma, C.A. and R. Mack, 1965. Nucleotide synthesis under possible
primitive earth conditions. Schience 146: 1221
Ponnamperuma, C.A. and N.W. Gabel, 1968. Current status of chemical
studies on the origin of life. Space Life Sci. 1: 64
Those are a few that produce something biological from something
abiological. You may argue over the conditions they assume earth had a
few billion years ago, but you cannot escape the fact that they created
SOMETHING biological.
> >account why you can't and why Nothing (chance) did. If you can't create
> >that, which chance did, then someone else gave chance a chance to create.
> >Skeptics have said the creation of the Universe was from the "Big Bang."
> >Well, who lit the fuse? Why did it happen only once andwhy isn't it an
> >ongoing thing? Why a one-time event? Look at the odds that life went through
> >to exist after creation of the Universe. Someone had a hand in it. You say
> >God doesn't exist? Why?
Logically, one cannot prove a negative.
You missed the whole point. You can't create anything with something that's
already in existence. That's not creation. I said create something
biologically unique from scratch. Not something that already exist. RNA is
not life. RNA and amino acids already exist throughout the Universe. Create
something biological that is unique. That's not creation as you put it.
Aubrey