re: blindspot (Hoover)
David Court (hoover1@netcom.ca)
Wed, 4 Dec 1996 18:28:16 -0500 (EST)
>Hoover wrote:
>>NIELSEN 11/30
>>> I'm sorry, Aubrey. I was trained to be a librarian, not a creator, so
>>>I can't oblige you. But I can report to you that whoever "designed" the
>>>mammalian eye did a poor job.
>
>It works for what it was designed to do didn't it? Can man build a better
>subsitute from scratch? After all, atheist said the eyeball was a produce of
>nothing(chance) and Man, with all of his knowledge, materials and equipment
>at hand, can't even come up with a simple biological subsitute. But
>"Nothing"(chance) didn't have any problems making something from nothing and
>Man can't even do that with something. If nothing can make something, than
>how come Man can't make something from something,(The Eye)? Nothing didn't
>have any problems creating something according to skeptics. Something is
>wrong with their argument. I guess it's nothing.
>Aubrey
>
(DAVE 12/2) Hi Aubrey: My name is Dave, not Hoover (that's my son's
nickname) and I didn't send this post to you, Ralph Neilson did.
I agree wholeheartedly with what you say though.
Best regards. Dave.>
>
"The ability to think on one's feet is critically important but it is
equally imperative to have personal and spiritual depth, fully aware of the
nature of the battle - both intellectual and spiritual."
- First Principles Forum pamphlet