>=20
>=20
> Isn't it interesting that all of the animals managed to find their way =
back to the very places where their fossil ancestors lived before the =
"flood".
Especially since the topography would have been quite different from=20
the pre-flood world.
For Audrey: Birds fly back to their original habitat, but is it=20
reasonable to believe that all of the animals would have naturally =
gotten=20
back to their original habitat when the topography would have been=20
drastically different? What guarantee or reason would there be to=20
believe that the same ecosystem which sustained them would have been=20
there or that the new one would be sufficient? =20
Mike
JLH
I have heard creationists try to use bird migrations to prove the ark =
story.