> is the publisher of that work and I was not moved. April, I suggest you
> go read some I. Howard Marshall,N.T. Wright, John A.T. Robertson, and
> when you are done with them, read some Richard Swinburne. April in short
> I bet I have read more of your position regarind philosophy and Atheism
> than you have. What does it prove? Not much. Challanging me to read a bk
> is not an argument. I have done it time and time again. Same result, I
> write my notes in the bk, create a brief summary of my general criticism
> and put it back on the shelf. I did the same with George Smith, McKinsey,
> Flew, Martin, Nielsen, PArsons, et al. Have a nice day. ;)
>
> NIKA ICXC
> PCR
>
I realize one can read and dismiss anything. The question is, did you
sufficiently answer the problems proposed by those authors (BTW, I haven't
read all of those, though I have read many others, but Smith's alone would
require a great deal of response before I would accept one's right to
"dismiss" it.)
The same can be said for Daleiden's book.
Cheers.
April