Re: A New Puzzel for our resident inerrantists

Michael W. Fisher (mwfisher@CTS.COM)
Wed, 4 Dec 1996 08:33:18 -0800

At 08:21 AM 12/4/96 -0500, Matthew wrote:
>Matthew 12/4
>Michael, I would be happy to address this as I think that the answer is
>quite simple. However, I need to understand precisely why you think that
>the creation in Gen. 1 and the creation in Gen. 2 are separate creations
>rather than simply one creation with the second being supplied in more
>detail and emphasis on Adam's subsequent actions.

I said nothing about the "first creation" in Genesis 1. If you think
that you can use it to solve the problem in Genesis 2, then by all means
knock yourself out (only a figure of speech).

Just be prepared to justify anything you do.

Ciao.
Michael Fisher, ET1/SS USN ret., lawstudent

http://www.sonoma.edu/cthink/Library/intraits.html

* * *

He that would make his own liberty secure,
must guard even his enemy from oppression;
for if he violates this duty,
he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.

Thomas Paine