> .
> >
> > (DAVE 11/22) Darrel: I'm not really surprised you have declined. I'm
> not
> > really a library either - you can buy your own copy of "The Case Against
> > God" - if you are implying I should read it, I will have a look for it.
> >
> > Regards. Dave.>
> >
> Speaking of book recommendations, I have just read a delightful one by
> Joseph Daleiden (BTW - anyone have his e-mail address? I'd like to send my
> compliments.) entitled "The Final Superstition". In it he conducts an
> imaginary dialogue with god where he addresses ALL of the major arguments
> of christianity, and dispatches them with ease, and, in some cases, humor.
> I challenge any theist to read this book all the way through and not see
> the fallacy of their beliefs.
>
> In intellegent rationality,
>
> April
>
April its on my list. But I have read gobs from Prometheus, who I believe
is the publisher of that work and I was not moved. April, I suggest you
go read some I. Howard Marshall,N.T. Wright, John A.T. Robertson, and
when you are done with them, read some Richard Swinburne. April in short
I bet I have read more of your position regarind philosophy and Atheism
than you have. What does it prove? Not much. Challanging me to read a bk
is not an argument. I have done it time and time again. Same result, I
write my notes in the bk, create a brief summary of my general criticism
and put it back on the shelf. I did the same with George Smith, McKinsey,
Flew, Martin, Nielsen, PArsons, et al. Have a nice day. ;)
NIKA ICXC
PCR